Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) is affordable and easy to obtain. FOSS is flexible and adaptable to local needs. It even claims to provide a better protection against computer viruses and other intruders.
Due to these characteristics, FOSS appears to be well suited for adoption by Civil Society Organisations (CSOs). After all, CSOs are active in the public space between the State and citizens. In many cases, they work with public funds, which means that they are accountable to the taxpayer. CSOs have an interest in effective networking at the national and international levels in order to attain their goals. Worldwide, tens of thousands of CSOs form a bridge between, or provide a voice for culturally and linguistically diverse local communities.
Indeed, during the World Summit for Information Society (WSIS) in 2003, CSOs presented the manifesto 'Shaping Information Societies for Human Needs,' in which FOSS was seen as the tool to overcome the worldwide digital divide.
Nonetheless, FOSS usage is spreading less rapidly than its advocates wish, and less rapidly than one would expect given the aforementioned advantages. There are a number of reasons.
The first is that the CSO community often does not speak the same language as the FOSS community of developers and FOSS-producing companies. These are two different worlds: the world of development cooperation, with its jargon of poverty reduction indicators, and Millenium Development Goals (MDGs), versus the world of software development, with its 'techies' and a jargon that is just as difficult for outsiders to follow. Those two worlds will have to communicate more often and in a more intensive way for this to lead to a winning match. Why do we see so few partnerships between FOSS companies and development CSOs?
The second obstacle is that the community of software developers, and particularly the FOSS community, is strongly male-dominated. It is embarrassing and a completely outdated fact that meetings on
A third problem is that the biggest advantage of FOSS – flexibility and freedom for everyone to modify the software to their own needs – sometimes becomes the largest disadvantage. There is an abundance of new FOSS -applications and tools. This is encouraging of course and diversity is one of the much-celebrated added-values of FOSS. But the user-friendliness and the standardisation of FOSS leave much to be desired. This is also the case for the documentation and support possibilities for users.
Many kinds of FOSS-based CMSs (Content Management Systems) for websites and for knowledge sharing compete with each other. These all claim to be the perfect solution for CSOs working in development and civil campaigning areas for the publication of their local content and towards real ownership for the users. Much knowledge and time are being invested to find the ultimate solution, in many cases reinventing the wheel.
Perhaps the largest problem of all, with the level of adoption of FOSS in the world of CSOs and NGOs, is the lack of a true political debate over the importance of FOSS. For example, at the end of 2003, Microsoft and the UNDP came to a $1-billion agreement in which the UN committed itself to the Gates empire. This agreement passed without as much as a stir in the slipstream of the WSIS in
Perhaps this is an overly pessimistic view. After all, the advance of FOSS in Asia in particular demonstrates that FOSS is here to stay. But it would be unfortunate if CSOs and NGOs would not make use of it on time. So, let's establish more FOSS and CSO partnerships, let's encourage more women to 'hack' their way into current male dominated FOSS communities and technologies, let's standardise and make user friendly OSS tools.
|Get a chance to meet who's who of Transport ecosystem in India including key policymakers from Central and State Governments. Join us at National Summit on ‘Strategy for Ports, Highways Infrastructure and Logistics Efficiency , New Delhi on Aug 13, 2018 to explore business opportunities. Like and connect with us on Facebook, Linkedin and Twitter.|